Sunday, November 14, 2010
Canadian proposal
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Spatial Planning
We are at a place in mankind’s intellectual growth that planning for our future has to be well thought out. History is a great teacher; the current trends reveal patterns of failure.
One of the most relevant aspects of space planning is in the study of Fung Shui (http://www.fungshway.net). In regards to particular books on the matter, a Google search would provide many choices.
The importance of spatial planning is to focus on servicing small needs of the individual. Placement, according to the art of fung shui science is maintaining the flow of movement. The question becomes: is there a greater demand for the rhythm of flow than in spatial planning?
In California, there is a rush for the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (regional government planning departments) to comply with new State mandates to lower greenhouse gases. The overall attitude of these organizations is to increase land-use densities. There is a lack of understanding within the governmental planning community that increasing population densities causes greater harm to the environment with the automobile at its foundation. The automobile is wholly unsustainable. Building society on an unsustainable foundation results in, well: LA is the result. The outcome is sprawl with social, environmental, and economic decline.
Increasing land use densities does not work with automobiles as the primary source of mobility.
With society’s perpetual growth, we are leaning towards the necessity for sustainability. The only alternative to reach sustainably is to have sustainable transportation as the source of mobility.
Blending the movement flow with fung shui science, the methods of historic community housing trends, and using new clean technology transit modes will certainly get functional spatial planning success.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Elections
When will politicians figure out that this is 2010? The public needs to be informed beyond the single minded political nonsense that refers to the antiquied heavy rail passenger train technology as job creation projects. Yeah, build a decent modern transportation system and it could actually be a transportation system project.
To hear the politicians claim the horridly expensive transportation are failure from the beginning and have to be referred to as "jobs creation" projects is unacceptable. New technology transit projects can be efficient clean transportation projects, they need public attention and informed politicians.
Friday, October 22, 2010
penalties
Ninety years of land-use kayos has created LA as an excellent model of what unsustainable looks like. Western society has embraced itself as an automobile centric culture, this unsustainable base creates addiction. Environmental, social and economic decline is the product of a unsustainable land-use foundation.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
To a comment about the economy
In less time than it would take the proposed old heavy rail train technology that the CA High Speed Rail Authority is pushing to be built, at its $70million to $120million per mile cost; a smaller vehicle system (which has direct to station destination capability) could be fully implemented with 1,000+ mile per hour capability for less than $15million per mile elevated. The comparison in reduced time to build is the lack of necessity for heavy structure engineering: those costs simply don't exist. Smaller vehicles weigh less and the structures have less weight to engineer and build.
Political tradition is the barrier to efficient transportation. Ignorance on behalf of the political officials is a detriment to everyone. The technique of "pork barrel spending" to achieve failed status-quo policy is a system doomed. Our current economic meltdown is the evidence.
Our current system of sprawl land-use is broken. New Technology Transit is the solution.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
amusing sidenote
Trains were a wonderful technology when they were introduced in the 1,800s. Our society has evolved intellectually over the past 150+ years. There is much less expensive technology available that is far superior to old fashion heavy trains.
Nonetheless; caught-up in tradition, we are forced to watch political jealousy in the fight for the proposed maintenance yard for California's fantasy train: it is pathetic. The Bakersfield newspaper, the Californian, reported Monday 180 acres has been offered to the CA HSRA in an effort to bring the maintenance yard of the proposed fantasy train to Bakersfield. This is like a sacrificial offering. The Fresno Bee reported the story a little different.
Want to know the real story behind the scenes in the world of politics with the HSR? The significance of choosing Shafter; it happens to be the home of one of the HSR Board Members: Fran Florez. Why would this matter or have any say in anything? Politics is favors and Fran's son is CA State Assemblyman Dean Florez. Dean had launched a strong campaign for Lieutenant Governor and was several months into the campaign when he suddenly withdrew to comply with the party line and handed over his efforts to that mayor from SF.
Since the mayor of Fresno is a staunch supporter of the other governor candidate Whitman, a Jerry Brown win as governor would logically cement the selection of CA's proposed HSR maintenance yard to the city of Shafter. Jerry Brown likes to thank people who have supported him.
Having said this, the Bakersfield paper article says the Paramount Farms 180 acre property is worth $7million to $8million. This must be prime real estate to be able to capture a huge write-off like that. Everywhere else in the Valley, developed farm land is only worth $3,500 to $7,000 per acre.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
catching up
Meanwhile Shweeb racing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDpwkZirSNU is an interesting project in New Zealand.
In the transit world, MagnaMotion continues it's progress. For the latest news:
http://www.magnemotion.com/corporate/project-news/main.shtml#update
Other news is happening but, still in the works.