Thursday, February 16, 2012

roll a coaster high speed rail

Following the HSR is like watching every move of a basketball being dribbled down the court in a basketball game. While voters balk at the escalating costs, the governor demands that the old technology electric train $98billion cost projections are too high; despite a 2010 expert study that claims actual cost estimate of $212billion. As dictators go, Jerry has no cloths. The logic Jerry must be using is the standardized cost of building an at grade expense of $70million per mile times 700 miles. The disconnect is representative to the dysfunction of bureaucracy which has only produced an unfinished EIR (environmental impact report) to show for the $600million spent on the project.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

From the SF Chronicle

Here is an informative article from the San Francisco Chronicle Sunday December 4, 2011 about the advertising money spent to push the CA HSR. This is the article:

They have yet to lay a single track, but the California High-Speed Rail Authority has spent some $12.5 million on public relations in the past two years - with a number of politically connected consultants getting in on the ride.

In one six-month window:

-- Mike Villines, the former Republican assemblyman, billed a Central Valley rail contractor for $108,631.

-- Denise LaPointe, a former chief of staff to ex-San Francisco state senator and former High-Speed Rail Authority board member Quentin Kopp, billed for $53,444. That was just part of the $350,288 paid to her firm since October 2009.

-- Nicole Franklin, a former Oakland city planning commissioner, got $45,138 - including a portion of LaPointe's work.

-- Mike Lynch, the former chief of staff to onetime Assemblyman Gary Condit, billed for $31,748.

-- Plus former Kern County Supervisor Gene Tackett ($70,652), and Sara Katz, a staffer to former Gov. Pete Wilson and onetime San Diego Mayor Susan Golding, whose monthly billings for the first half of the year totaled $43,505.

"Frankly I can't see one benefit of that $12.5 million in spending," said state Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo.

"To me this is indicative of the operations of the High-Speed Rail Authority to this point, which from what we've seen is pretty much a failure."

Statewide, some 20 PR outfits have worked on the project since 2007 as part of nine regional engineering contracts.

In 2009, however, rail authority directors - worried that they needed to sell the project statewide - awarded a five-year contract worth $9 million to Ogilvy Public Relations, a major national firm.

After paying Ogilvy about $3 million, the authority was not happy with its performance and the two sides agreed to a parting of the ways.

In the meantime, as shrinking federal dollars put the future of the train line in doubt, the authority has still budgeted $2.5 million for PR this fiscal year.

Rail authority officials say the spending on public outreach has been reasonable given the size and complexity of the project.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Addressing Sprawl and Blight

Our car culture makes a direct connection of style changes to the automobile and how fashions impact tract house designs.
Blight is a corollary of automobile centric growth. Because our car culture is based on the automobile; and fashion is a conscious marketing tool in the sales of automobile design, so follow decade period cycles to style trends of tract houses. Tract housing developments and strip malls are the direct correlation to urban sprawl expansion. Tract houses are directly affected by contemporary design criteria. As clothing fashion styles change from season to season, the tract house styles make major shifts every decade. Inasmuch as fashions quickly go out of date, each tract style becomes out of vogue after a decade and a new tract house area becomes popular.
What is blight and how it happens. Blight is the result of cyclic design changes within the car culture. Tract houses are designed by sprawl developers as fashion statements to maintain the status-quo of cyclic trends. The tendency of society’s car culture mentality follows patterns based on that era’s marketing popularity for sprawl development and abandons unfashionable areas. As the new areas are built-out over a decade, older areas are unable to compete with the newly created trend. These older areas hold a lower real estate value and are targeted as unwanted investment properties with lost pride of ownership and become poorly maintained rental properties. As they fall victim to several decades, the mass produced quality of these low value houses become target to first time home buyers and higher foreclosure rates. Once these forgotten areas gather low value rental status, many properties fall into foreclosure and become abandoned. When abandoned properties are boarded up and the chain linked fences become the norm, blight dominates the area.
Visual hostility is a term coined by Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Ph.D., Chair, UCLA Dept. of Urban Planning, relating to her studies on the effects of the metro system in LA.
Abandoned neighborhoods are filled with visual hostility. This hostility is seen as empty lots, weeds, dead landscaping, trash, boarded windows, busted and blocked sidewalks, chain link fences, barbed wire, coiled razor wire, busted windows and graffiti. Concrete walls appear as prisons to those burdened and confined to living in these areas. Blight has a devastating emotional and mental attitude effect to children forced to grow up in these areas, as well as the adults. The behavior patterns mirror one’s surrounding environment. The residents of these areas are consequently affected with a mental attitude that has a visual onslaught of prison, poverty and war.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

The HSRA Business Plan

California's revised high speed rail authority's business plan has been out for a few days. One of the main objections from the opposition was that the project is going to cost more than California can afford in its budget. Money seems like an irrelevant issue to the HSRA. The HSRA boasts that these new figures are now accurate; so anyone against the project has no validation. How is it that by doubling their estimated costs it suddenly is suppose to solve the lack of funds to build it?

One of the best explanations of the new HSRA budget is described in a Sacramento Bee article from November 5th.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Bump in the track

The HSR has a flaw in its tracks. As detailed in the October 8th Fresno Bee article, one of Fresno's assistant staffers compiled a 37 page powerpoint to explain some problems with CA's HSR proposed line through Fresno to the City Council. Two of the Councilmen spilled their glasses of tasty HSRA Kool-Aid.

The fundamental questions are ignored even in this Bee article. The concept of illegitimacy to CA's HSR is due to its antiquated 100 year old technology. Society has grown in California over the past 100 years and a modern transportation system is the answer. Would it be reasonable to build one statewide telegraph line similar to what was provided in the late 1800s to bear all the needs of California's communication needs? Then why is that 1890's style electrified heavy rail steel wheel on rail train being suggested as a Statewide transportation system?

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

CA High Speed Rail EIR

Well, the California High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) environmental impact report (EIR) has been released. According to the original intent of the 1970’s California Legislative law which requires an EIR for every public project, an EIR is suppose to be no longer than 300 pages; in a effort to allow such document to be easily understandable. The new HSRA EIR is 11,000 pages long.

Without having read the EIR, this author; an expert in the New Technology Transit industry, would jump to the presumption that the words: “common sense” is a phrase never seen in the 11,000 page document. Other missing words to describe the document will be words such as: “viable”, “economical” or “affordable”.

government waste

This is a statement to address the recent COG (Fresno County Council of Governments; which handles all of Fresno County’s transportation funding) effort in its RFP (Request for Proposal) to study a sustainable transportation plan. The qualifications to produce such a study excluded the best opportunity to provide COG with a viable plan by only accepting requests from previous or traditional sources.

There is already a 250 page business plan by Central Transit & Development Corp (CTDC) to provide Central California with a viable transportation alternative from the automobile. For the City of Fresno and COG to continue their conscious effort to ignore CTDC’s project displays an irresponsible disservice to the residents of Central California.

Legislators in the State of California have initiated environmental mandates to each MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization: COG is the regional MPO) that creates a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) within the MPO’s regional transportation plan (RTP).

The CTDC plan was established to adapt the existing automobile centric urban land-use design to an economically viable automobile alternative. The CTDC business plan utilizes a New Technology Transit system that is environmentally, economically and socially sustainable. For the City of Fresno and COG to continually ignore the CTDC plan that includes a viably sustainable transportation and urban growth plan that provides economic stability and social equity shows a level of governmental ineptness that is beyond comprehension. COG’s response to the CTDC plan is to solicit one of the established consultant groups and give them $250,000 to provide COG with a study that is supposed to give them an idea of how to achieve a SCS utilizing the same techniques that the consultants have used to get us to where we are.

CTDC has taken a position of responsible development with its approach to provide social equity, environmental justice, and economic stability. This combination has staggered the bureaucratic procedure into unprecedented shock. It is unheard of for a private entity to include social equity into a development that benefits the community. There is no procedure for a private entity to provide a contemporary environmental solution that includes building a sustainable transportation system. It is unprecedented for a development project to establish a viable local economic generator capable of stimulating the regional economy through the nature of its project. The CTDC project is such a startling concept to the bureaucratic process they are dumbfound into a reaction of disbelief because it is outside of their procedure.