Six months has passed since the previous post. What has transpired to the politics of California's HSR? In a word: nothing. The fighting continues; the supporters are delusional and the opponents are forced to accept the mandates of deception.
Yesterday one of the local radical political proponents posted a Facebook rant against California Congressman Jeff Denham for his act of fiscal responsibility in calling for the federal dollars to go to the Northeast corridor Amtrak instead of the blindly planned CA HSRA. The ludicrous language used on the Facebook page written by the project support supporter is sustained by his followers with avid glee. The post was filled with rage against the Congressman. Jeff Denham is chairman of the railroads subcommittee in the House of Representatives. As the June 7, 2013 article reports, posted at McCarthyDC.com; the greater need for federal money is in the Northeast Corridor.
The vitriol and contempt of people that support CA's proposed HSR is built upon ignorance. It is sad to read comments filled with incorrect information. The mass deception amounts to strengthening lies. CA's HSR is nothing more than a continuation of the corrupt political process for building a monument to the way things are.
As the title of this blog states, the author is interested in the future of transit. The 150 year old technology proposed by the CA HSRA is, to say the least: outdated. A look at society's current transportation needs has to consider social patterns. We, as a culture have grown more socially independent than where culture was 150 years ago when the train allowed urban growth. Today people are more independent and our transportation demands are no longer centered at central station locations. Los Angeles, for example, covers a very large geographic area but, the proposed train services this huge area with Union Station, which was built about 100 years ago. This leads to the question: has LA grown in 100 years?
As society grows, so do the transportation needs. Government was not the source of growth in the US. The growth and expansion came from private enterprise. What is different in our culture today that seems to require government be responsible to build transportation infrastructure. The infrastructure of roads are synonymous to automobile centric urban growth. With the automobile being wholly unsustainable, any culture whose foundation is based on an unsustainable source: that culture is doomed to decline. Sustainable urban growth requires sustainable transportation.
The people who blindly support the notion of California needing a transportation system to replace the unsustainable nature of the automobile must embrace practical solutions that afford sustainability. There are many viable technologically advanced transportation systems. One is ET3, here is an article from June 8, 20013 at Boomsy.com.
Many technologies are available to supply sustainable transportation alternatives to meet society's modern transportation requirements.
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Let The Fighting Begin
According The Fresno Bee article today (January 14, 2013) the HSRA goes to the Public Works office today for approval to purchase property. This is essentially the process of condemning privately owned property for all the people who don't have a desire to sell their property. This is where the attorneys get involved and sue the State action.
The biggest issue against the project in terms of being realistic is that there is no plan from the State on how to pay for the proposed project. There are various figures used by the HSRA as to how much the federal government is allocating, generally that figure ranges around $20billion. Add the $9billion from the manipulated 1A bond legislation passed in 2008 and the figure comes to nearly $30billion from public taxation (public sources means people paid taxes). The private sector is expected to pay for the remaining $38billion except that, according the the HSRA, no private entities are willing to obligate $38billion. It is understood that the private sector will invest into a project that brings a profit but, where will the profit come from? Current procedure for building projects of this type are only built with government guarantees, this, of course, means that the HSRA will have to obligate its projected annual operations and maintenance budget towards a private contractor. This means that the government will 'lend' the money to a private contractor for the contractors participation. Again, this is bond money, or money that the government borrows.
A good article for the financing arrangements can be found at California Common Sense in an article by Christopher Knight in July, 2012. It explains specific details about the proposed CA HSR project.
Having followed the procedure and policy of the proposed HSR project, one finds the political force pushing the project is very strong. It is very clear that the will of this very strong political force does not comprehend what is good for the people of California but, it seeks expensive contracts which bring profit to these elite politically connected organizations who find their profit at the expense of the taxpayer. Again, the proposed CA HSR project has nothing to do with transportation; it is only the political process of high level income generation for the politically connected.
The biggest issue against the project in terms of being realistic is that there is no plan from the State on how to pay for the proposed project. There are various figures used by the HSRA as to how much the federal government is allocating, generally that figure ranges around $20billion. Add the $9billion from the manipulated 1A bond legislation passed in 2008 and the figure comes to nearly $30billion from public taxation (public sources means people paid taxes). The private sector is expected to pay for the remaining $38billion except that, according the the HSRA, no private entities are willing to obligate $38billion. It is understood that the private sector will invest into a project that brings a profit but, where will the profit come from? Current procedure for building projects of this type are only built with government guarantees, this, of course, means that the HSRA will have to obligate its projected annual operations and maintenance budget towards a private contractor. This means that the government will 'lend' the money to a private contractor for the contractors participation. Again, this is bond money, or money that the government borrows.
A good article for the financing arrangements can be found at California Common Sense in an article by Christopher Knight in July, 2012. It explains specific details about the proposed CA HSR project.
Having followed the procedure and policy of the proposed HSR project, one finds the political force pushing the project is very strong. It is very clear that the will of this very strong political force does not comprehend what is good for the people of California but, it seeks expensive contracts which bring profit to these elite politically connected organizations who find their profit at the expense of the taxpayer. Again, the proposed CA HSR project has nothing to do with transportation; it is only the political process of high level income generation for the politically connected.
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
HSR Property Acquisition
Another HSR related story in the Fresno Bee 12/26/12. The story talks about how eminent domain will be handled for the CA HSRA with a $34million contract to four law firms. One located in the state of Virginia, one from Pismo Beach, one from Sacramento and the other in Oklahoma.
With an award of $34million the law firms should have enough motivation to obfuscate property owners in a similar manner that the EIR intimidates onlookers with its extraneous information.
California's HSR project has two distinct mindsets. The dominating attitude of the State is revealed in the article: " Rail authority representatives believe they will be able to successfully negotiate with most of the affected property owners in the Valley and anticipate that relatively few will carry a contest all the way through to an eminent domain trial.
There are so many unanswered questions regarding the HSR project's business plan, one has to ask how the project can move forward. The litigation is growing and yet, so far, the HSRA has bounced back from all the set backs that should have knocked this thing off the tracks.
With an award of $34million the law firms should have enough motivation to obfuscate property owners in a similar manner that the EIR intimidates onlookers with its extraneous information.
California's HSR project has two distinct mindsets. The dominating attitude of the State is revealed in the article: " Rail authority representatives believe they will be able to successfully negotiate with most of the affected property owners in the Valley and anticipate that relatively few will carry a contest all the way through to an eminent domain trial.
Attorneys say that is the norm nowadays when agencies seek to buy private land for public projects."
The proposed HSR project is far from being a normal public project. By hiring out of the area attorneys, is this a move by the HSRA to provides insight to the peculiar needs of the Valley's land owners? With the strength of uniting, such as the Madera County Farm Bureau's claim to have a joined effort to be unwilling sellers, does this conflict with the remarks from the HSRA representatives that there will be no court litigation? With additional court litigation, the State will have to pick up extra costs for unexpected court fees and first class air tickets back and forth to Virginia and Oklahoma. As normal bureaucratic procedure goes, this will tally up to millions of unanticipated dollars beyond the $34million contract. There are so many unanswered questions regarding the HSR project's business plan, one has to ask how the project can move forward. The litigation is growing and yet, so far, the HSRA has bounced back from all the set backs that should have knocked this thing off the tracks.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Misinformed
There is much concern in the Valley from farmers about the loss of their farms. In a written statement, the Farm Bureau said that the rail line will displace "hundreds of farms."
"These farmers are the ones whose property is being threatened," said
Anja Raudabaugh, executive director of the Madera County Farm Bureau.
Raudabaugh said farmers in Madera County are unified in fighting the
loss of land to the rail authority. Rather than sell all or part of
their affected parcels, the farmers are prepared to force the state to
use eminent domain -- to go to court and ask a judge to order the
property be sold to the rail authority.
"It's taken six months, but I've finally contacted every single
property owner along the route from Avenue 17 south to the San Joaquin
River," she added. "Except for one, everyone else is getting ready to be
unwilling sellers."
On the other side is Jeffrey Morales, the rail authority's CEO, who is quoted in the article:
"We think eminent domain will be a minority of the parcels," he said."On the other side is Jeffrey Morales, the rail authority's CEO, who is quoted in the article:
The Bee sought out the one property owner who is excited to work with the HSRA and interviewed him: "Instead, he's excited about a planned Road 27 overpass over both the
high-speed line and the BNSF tracks. "Once they put in that overpass,
the freight trains won't have to honk their horns," he said. "That's
noisy, and it drives the dogs nuts."
"Unlike other landowners who vow to force the rail agency to go to court
for their land, "I'm going to work with them," Ureña said, "but I want
to make sure I'm fairly compensated."
Apparently Juan Urena is unaware of the high pitch 95 decibel screech the proposed train squeels each time it passes. According to the CA HSRA's own data: (http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/assets/0/152/198/1efc92bd-1ce9-4514-bb8c-be51d1320488.pdf ) the sound at 100 feet is equivalent to a lawn mower or an un-muffled diesel truck. For Juan's benefit, a train horn blast at 100 feet ranges from 97 to 107 decibels.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Fiscal Responsibility
The CA HSR is a political Juggernaut The momentum of political favoritism is astounding when looking behind the scenes. In an opinion piece published 12/10/12 in the Orange County Registrar author Wendell Cox has some interesting facts to his opposition of the HSR.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Quality Workmanship
To further display the useless blunder of frivolous government spending gone awry the December 6, 2012 Fresno Bee article explains how inept workers will be required to work on the proposed CA HSR project. 30% of the workforce will be required to know nothing about the work they will be hired to do. The lack of wisdom from the California's HSRA Board shows with the unanimous vote to hire inept worker; further proof that the project is an irrational waste.
Friday, November 16, 2012
The "Jobs" Project Rolls
Advancing environmentally clean transportation took a tragic turn today to embrace antiquated technology when trains were electric in the 1800's. It is also a bold government move to thwart objections and complaints against procedural process and removing individual's property rights
The biggest misconception about CA's HSR is that it has nothing to do with transportation. The proposed project is marketed as a train but, lobbied as a "jobs" project. An actual functioning transportation project designed to vastly reduce commute times, increase regional productivity and improve the deflating economy would cost far less with modern transportation technology. CA's HSR project is a political process designed to serve the politically elite with the gravy train of favoritism. Those few, most specifically the one: in control; his power to persuade is remarkable.
An aggravating day of defeatism in the world of the caring and morally sane.
The biggest misconception about CA's HSR is that it has nothing to do with transportation. The proposed project is marketed as a train but, lobbied as a "jobs" project. An actual functioning transportation project designed to vastly reduce commute times, increase regional productivity and improve the deflating economy would cost far less with modern transportation technology. CA's HSR project is a political process designed to serve the politically elite with the gravy train of favoritism. Those few, most specifically the one: in control; his power to persuade is remarkable.
An aggravating day of defeatism in the world of the caring and morally sane.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
