In a recent transportation newsletter this statement was
made: “The Hudson Valley is a centrally located region with abundant fresh
water that could absorb millions of new urban residents. By 20th century
thinking, this would mean more highways and parking lots to accommodate
auto-dependent living. Nobody wants major urban growth. People prefer green
valleys and hills with low-density development. So Cuomo’s staff aren’t even
thinking about this, let alone devoting planning resources to an APM-centered
future.” Since; “Nobody wants major
urban growth. People prefer green valleys and hills with low-density
development” how can this type of urban growth continue? The statement that followed “Nobody wants
major urban growth” proves a very problematic conclusion that government planning
staffs are doing the opposite. How is
this legitimized? In the world of government, politic's campaign contributors are considered the players and receive favors
for their contributions. These favors
are free deeded properties, grants and zero interest loans.
California legislators have drawn attention to their environmentally
strict policies while the status-quo of deteriorating infrastructure is a
malignant cancer. Rather than purifying
the quality of the State’s well-being, it has caused a malicious growth of
financial favoritism which diminishes its citizen health. Under Governor Reagan the CA EPA was
established to provide protection to the environment. All public jobs are now required to adhere to
a EIS (Environmental Impact Study) with a maximum 300-page report (EIR,
Environmental Impact Report). The
politicians have twisted the significance of this report to make the inclusion
that if the project is unable to comply with environmental requirements, due to
a myriad of reasons, then it doesn’t have to comply, upon the approval of the
project’s governing body.
As an example; CA HSR project spent over $800-million to
produce a useless and incomplete 12,000 page EIR. The project was ruled by Jerry Brown to be
exempt from CA environmental rules and regulations. His friend and husband of CA’s Senator is the
largest single shareholder of the firm that held the EIS contract.
The travesty is damage done to the decaying infrastructure. Automobiles are fundamental to urban growth in
the automobile centric design. Within
the government planning agencies there is a self- gratifying term used called: “Smart
Growth”. Lipstick on a pig. When planners use this term they consider
themselves smart.
Outside the spheres of the government’s malignant tumors is
a tool called innovation. It is time for
a revolution in thought, creativity and fairness. First task: modern transportation.
No comments:
Post a Comment